If this poem were re-written as a narrative essay, how might the author best structure the essay to convey the same meaning as the poem?

A)
The narrative essay would tell the story of the narrator's struggle to find a balance between love of art and science without rhymes.

B)
The narrative essay would contain literary devices that would help to convey the same meaning as the poem.

C)
The narrative essay would include a formal introduction, thesis, body, and conclusion.

D)
The narrative essay would include characters whose dialogue would help to convey meaning

STORYY:
Most students have their preferences of jobs they’d like to do.1
Unlike those kids, I flounder between one career or two.2

On one hand, I aspire to an Ivy League vocation:3
professor of the sciences in higher education.4

But like noble amphibians that thrive on land and in the stream,5
I’ve got another world of which I like to gladly dream.6

Some say that it’s abnormal; my affections are exclusive.7
In science, they say, emotions are something quite elusive.8

My systematic brain says I can span the two dimensions:9
science book procedures and painting skill conventions.10

Quite flexible, I switch between a microscope and brush;11
I find that others tend to choose and stick with only one.12

That renders me what science calls a special rarity—13
like a fossil that still frolics or an unknown masterpiece—14

Where one wants inspiration, a force that’s quite profound,15
the other needs analysis to prove its facts are sound.16

Teachers say they’ve never met a kid who overlaps17
a love of science with a flair for portraits, arts, and crafts.18

But to me, art seems like science; they are singular; however,19
science, at its best, is quite a beautiful endeavor.2