How did listening to a subject talk about the dilemma allow Kohlberg to determine a person’s level of moral reasoning?
A
Kohlberg could determine if they were more concerned with looking good than doing good.
B
Kohlberg could understand how people decided what was the right thing to do.
C
Kohlberg could understand if being truthful in their reply was important or not.
D
Kohlberg could decide if they picked the right answer and give them a score.

person against person: the hunger games bookteens were sent to fight against each other. they were sent in groups of two's. but could only be one winner. this conflict gave me a emotion of sadness. it made me feel bad for the kids that was sent there.  

explanation:

you have to tell us what you're talking about or it's impossible to answer.

different routes can lead to sammy to different places, with different roads.   if you check a map, you can see the routes.   try to make connections of the places and count how many there are.   hope this : )