Paulo wrote an article in favor of letting the history club use the library after school instead of the writing club, since the history club needs to use the library’s history books. He then found a study stating that having open access to books drastically improves students’ writing skills, since it enables them to draw inspiration from books, check sources, and compare their efforts with other writers’.

How should Paulo adjust his argument based on this new information?

A. He should revise his article in favor of allowing the two groups to take turns using the library.

B. He should argue that the school started its history club years before it formed the writing club.

C. He should ask the librarians which club is better behaved when they are studying in the library.

D. He should demonstrate that the history club currently has more members than the writing club.

A. He should revise his article in favor of allowing the two groups to take turns using the library.

Explanation:

Paulo's initial article was in favor of the history club to gain access to the library after school. With this, members of the club would be able to use the library's history books. The writting club had to use any other available venue for her meeting.

On realising also the importance of library to the writting club, he should  revise his article to describe the essence of library to the writting club. So that both clubs would be allowed to use the library in turns. With this, both clubs would have access to required materials and to also make full use of their books appropriately.

The revised article would clarify the usefulness of library to both clubs and reduce any form of inefficiency among members.

A

Explanation:

lets g

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.