Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. cowrote his "I Have a Dream" speech with his close confidant Clarence
Jones. In 2011, Clarence Jones and Stuart Connelly published Behind the Dream, a behind-the-scenes
account of the weeks leading up to King's delivery of that speech at the March on Washington. The
following passage is an excerpt from the prologue to Behind the Dream. Read the passage carefully. Then,
write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices Jones makes to achieve his purpose.
In your response you should do the following:
Respond to the prompt with a thesis that analyzes the writer's rhetorical choices.
Select and use evidence to develop and support your line of reasoning.
Explain the relationship between the evidence and you thesis.
Demonstrate an understanding of the rhetorical situation.
Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument.
A quarter of a million people, human beings who generally had spent their lives treated as something less,
stood shoulder to shoulder across that vast lawn, their hearts beating as one. Hope on the line. When hope was
an increasingly scarce resource.
There is no death of prose describing the mass of humanity that made its way to the feet of the Great
Emancipator[2] that day, no metaphor that has slipped through the cracks waiting to be discovered, dusted off,
and injected into the discourse a half century on. The March on Washington has been compared to a tsunami,
a shockwave, a wall, a living monument, a human mosaic, an outright miracle.
It was all of those things, and if you saw it with your own eyes, it wasn't hard to write about. With that many
people in one place crying out for something so elemental, you don't have to be Robert Frost to offer some
profound eloquence.
Still, I can say to those who know the event only as a steely black-and-white television image, it's a shame that
the colors of that day-the blue sky, the vibrant green life, the golden sun everywhere-are not part of our
national memory. There is something heart-wrenching about the widely shown images and film clips of the
event that belies the joy of the day. But it could be worse. We could have been marching in an era before
cameras and recording devices, then the specifics of the event would eventually fade out of living memory and
the world would be left only with the mythology and the text. Text without context, in this case especially, would
be quite a loss. One might imagine standing before an audience and reading Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr's
" Have a Dream" speech verbatim, but it is a stretch to believe that any such performance would sow the seeds
of change with, as Dr. King put it that day in Washington, the "fierce urgency of now." The vast crowd, the great
speaker, the words that shook the world-it all comes as a package deal. We are truly fortunate to have a
record. Yet what the television cameras and radio microphones captured that August day is but a sliver of the
vibrancy of the event. When a film adaptation of a beloved novel premieres, the people who say "Oh, buty i
got to read the book" are inevitably right. The density of the written word makes the flat motion picture a par
artifact in comparison. In a similar fashion, although watching the black-and-white news footage of Dr. King's
Submit
HELP PLEAS