Which statements correctly analyze Nehru’s use of evidence to support his claim? Check all that apply. Nehru’s use of logical evidence, such as the need to bring opportunity to common people and the need to end poverty, are effective in convincing the nation to work hard on its problems. Nehru’s empirical evidence of poverty rates in India effectively persuades the audience that work needs to be done to improve the economy. Empirical evidence, from research into poor educational opportunities, effectively supports Nehru’s claim that the nation must work hard to improve social justice. Nehru’s use of logical evidence based on the steps necessary to solve India’s problems is effective in convincing the assembly to work toward solving these issues. Anecdotal evidence of Nehru’s personal vision for India inspires the assembly to work hard.

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

hey, my username is theoneandonly003#9598, add me.

idk

explanation:

no

explanation: