The fireflies had arrived, just as my father said they would, and I watched them with my dry lips parted in wonder, my palms sliding expectantly on the lap of my dress. I felt like running and greeting them, but they joined me instead. Dozens of tiny blinks materialized, floating.
"I'm Jeliza-Rose," I said, bouncing on my crossed legs. "Hello."
Their flickers indicated understanding: The more I spoke, the more they blinked—or so I believed.
In vain I reached out, attempting to snatch the nearest one, but when I unclenched my fist there was nothing to be seen. After several failed captures, I made myself content by simply naming the fireflies as they flashed.
"You're Michael. You're Ann. Are you Michael again? No, wait, you're Barbie. And that's Chris. There's Michael."
Then the fireflies were gone, having been whisked afield by the wind. I glanced in the direction of the old house, wondering if my father was in the living room, quiet and awaiting my return.
adapted from Tideland by Mitch Cullin
3
How would the story be different if it were told from the third person point of view?
A.
The audience would see that the narrator is brave for playing with the bugs.
B.
The audience would see that the narrator is foolish for naming the bugs.
C.
The audience would know where the father is at the end of the story.
D.
The audience would know how scared the narrator is of the fireflies.

C) The audience would know where the father is at the end of the story.

Explanation:

C is the correct answer because in this first person narration the narrator does not know what the father is doing as supported by "I glanced in the direction of the old house, wondering if my father was in the living room, quiet and awaiting my return." but in third person we would be able to see both point of views and we'd know where the father is.

C. The audience would know where the father is at the end of the story

Explanation:

I would say this because there is no reason as to why we (the audience) think the narrator is brave for playing with bugs. I do not think we would see it as foolish for the narrator naming the bugs because it do not tell us the narrators age, but we can tell the narrator is a child. From the perspective of the narrator, he/she was not afraid, so they can not be afraid. That leaves us with the only answer, which is C. I'm sorry if the answer is not correct. This is just what i think it is. Again sorry in advanced!

pls include the text ur reading

answer

answer: a: they can affect the author’s perspective and in turn the theme and purpose for the writing.

the author's background and time period greatly affect the text that the author produces. this is because we are all a reflection of our time period and background. depending on where and when we were born, we will find some questions more important than others. for example, if we are a wealthy person born in medieval times, we will most likely be interested in courtly love and stories of knights and honour. however, if we are born in the 20th century in africa, we might instead focus on colonialism and its effects on the newly liberated countries. the theme and the purpose of writing are both affected by these conditions.

explanation: