One conclusion reader could make after reading the article is that astronauts train for prolonged isolation in space. which of the following statements accurately paraphrases evidence from the article to support the conclusion?

the answer is b. the tomb is underground and dark, and its opening is covered by a heavy grate.

i'm thinking it would be when compound subjects are joined by or, nor,either-or, neither-nor.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.