What explains how or why the evidence supports a claim?

Is there a passage or something to read to understand the question?

Explanation:Evidence acts as justification for the arguments given and tends to persuade the public to accept statements. Evidence comes in different kinds, and tends to vary from one academic field or subject of argument to another.They offer audiences a way to see the idea illustrated in a specific case in a public speech.

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.