Argumentive essay about the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Thousands upon thousands of acres are lost in forest fires every year.  We always hear about the dramatic losses caused by forest fires and are often concerned by them.  There are so many horrible effects from fires and most of them affect so many people.  Studies have shown that out of all of the different methods to decrease fire damage, prescribed burns are the most affective.  Many people would argue that they are not as affective because they cause so many health problems.  Although that is a very important view and may seem valid, those health issues are not as extreme as one might think.  People should look at the majority of the benefits form prescribed burns and they will see how affective and important they are.…show more content…

There are also so many animals that go along with the damage from the fires because they are living in the middle of it and do not have any where to go.  It makes sense that actions such as controlled burns should be done because so much could be prevented.  Then again there are so many people who argue against them because they are a disruption to the environment.  “Fire experts argue that prescribed burns are vital for reducing the risk of catastrophic blazes and restoring ecosystems that evolved with fire” (Tobin 2).  If a great deal of damage could be prevented, I do not see why there should be any concern.  This is especially important when you look at what more damage is done to the environment during a huge forest fire compared to on from a petite controlled burn.  

wow

Explanation:

hfhh

explanation:

hfh