What is the reporter’s motive in article 1? What is the reporter’s motive in article 2? Which term from Senator Nelson’s quote in article 2 is an example of bias?
Valido Accused of Accepting Bribes
Art1:
Unpopular conservative senator Raymond Valido (R-Louisiana) stands accused of accepting more than $1 million in campaign donations from the Nosco Oil Company in exchange for his efforts to pass a bill. The bill would allow the company to build a massive oil pipeline that will span the entire East Coast of the US.

Senate colleagues on both sides of the aisle are demanding Valido release his campaign finance reports.

“If Valido did accept these contributions from Nosco, he essentially accepted a bribe and is now fulfilling his part of the bargain,” said Senator Michelle Saud (D-New Hampshire).
The Federal Election Commission saw no evidence of unlawful conduct in Valido’s fundraising. However, if the senator did accept contributions in return for legislative favors, he may be censured by the Senate.
Art2:
Pipeline Foes Accuse Valido of Misconduct

The Federal Election Commission reported Wednesday that its initial investigation into Louisiana senator Raymond Valido’s 2016 reelection campaign showed no apparent irregularities, despite accusations from liberal senators that Valido took $1.1 million dollars from Nosco Oil in exchange for consideration of that company’s proposed East Coast pipeline.

Valido does not dispute Nosco’s campaign contribution, but insists that he made no promises to the Nova Scotian oil company about their pipeline.

“There was no bribe, and I did not strike a bargain with Nosco executives,” Valido said in a statement.

Although a Senate censure is unlikely, Valido’s Republican colleague Sarah Nelson (R-Georgia) said, “We will defend Senator Valido in this liberal witch hunt.”

1) to report factual events with added commentary.

2) to report on the unfolding investigation

3) “witch hunt”

Explanation:

Brainliest Answer Please!

1) to report factual events with added commentary.

2) to report on the unfolding investigation

3) “witch hunt”

Explanation:

peru sabe que indecopi jamas sirve imponen barreras para defender tus derechos. indecopi jamas investiga los casos a fondo y peor aun indecopi no defiende como debe ser los derechos de los consumidores. indecopi esta pintada es una institucion pagada por nuestros impuestos sin embargo nunca nos sirve para nada. indecopi jamas castiga a las operadoras ejemplarmente, encima nos cobran por reclamar lo que deberia ser gratuito y nunca investigan, pero si engordan sus bolsillos con nuestros impuestos, en conclusion indecopi esta pintada no sirve para nada.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)