PLEASEEE HELP! I WILL MARK YOU THE BRAINLEIST
An occasion in which it would be appropriate to use formal rhetorical devices such as parallelism would be a speech for a commencement or dedication. These occasions call for a more elevated level of speech, and parallel structure serves that purpose well. But can you think of some instances in which using parallelism (or some other formal rhetorical device) would serve to undermine, rather than facilitate, one's purpose? What are some of the drawbacks with using this kind of rhetorical device?

a persuasive piece of writing would not benefit from parallelism

Explanation:

parallelism is a form of comparison, so in an attempt to convince someone to make a clear choice, drawing parallels would not be an effective strategy

the answer is:  

he is voicing feelings shared by all humans regardless of race.

in paul laurence dunbar's poem "we wear the mask," he replicates the words mask and we to emphasize how people in general -not just black americans- hide their true feelings. he suggests the masks cover people's faces and eyes, which are the main parts that display their emotions. he also thinks people's pain conceal behind those masks, so that they cannot see reality and nobody is able to see one another's sorrow.

b and d

explanation: