Which evidence best supports the conclusion that the
narrator is telling this story with a particular child in mind?
"You can see when you go to the beach, how all Pau
Amma's babies make little Pusat Taseks for themselves
under every stone and bunch of weed on the sands: you
can see them waving their little scissors."
"But once a year all Pau Ammas must shake off their
hard armour and be soft-to remind them of what the
Eldest Magician could do."
"It isn't fair to kill or hunt Pau Amma's babies just
because old Pau Amma was stupidly rude a very long
time ago.
"Pau Amma's babies hate being taken out of their little
Pusat Taseks and brought home in pickle-bottles. That is
why they nip you with their scissors, and it serves you
right

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

attitude toward the subject implied in a literary work.

serious at times, angry, impassioned, and optimistic, but most of all urgent

well to have a good poem you need to have it where it rymes cause if it didnt ryme it wouldnt be a poem