C) Write the questions. Then answer them. 1. You / watch TV / last night 2. Your friends / play football / yesterday Did you watch TV last night? Yes, I did. / No, I didn't 3. Your mum / bake / a cake / last weekend 4. You / phone / a friend / an hour ago

The tenses are considered as the method that dweller s use in order to refer to time-past, present ad future. Various languages use tense to talk about time.

1. Did you watch TV last night?

Yes, I watched a movie.

2. Did your friends play football yesterday?

No, they did not. They played football three days ago.

3. Did your mum bake a cake last weekend?

Yes she did. It was delicious.

4. Did you phone a friend an hour ago?

No, I didn't. I was studying an hour ago.

These questions must be asked in the past simple. How do we realize that? as they have expression of past time like yesterday, last weekend and last night, etc.

To know more about past simple, refer to the link:

link

The correct answers are:

1. Did you watch TV last night?

- Yes, I watched a movie.

2. Did your friends play football yesterday?

-No, they didn't. They played football three days ago.

3. Did your mum bake a cake last weekend?

- Yes she did. It was delicious.

4. Did you phone a friend an hour ago?

- No, I didn't. I was studying an hour ago.

Explanation:

These questions should be asked in the past simple. How do we realize that? Because they all have expressions of past time: yesterday, last weekend, last night, etc.

To formulate the questions in the past we will use the auxiliar DID (which is the past of Do). This estructure is the next one:

Auxiliary Did + person + verb

To answer them, we can do it in two ways:

With: Yes, I did. // No, I didn't.

Or with the main verb of the sentence, for example:

1. Did you watch TV last night?

 - Yes, I watched a movie.

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.