subject
English, 29.05.2020 23:08 emmaschloegl21x

How do these passages differ in their ideas about the Magnuson Fishery and Conservation Act?
A. The author of the first passage believes that the Act is damaging, and the author of the second passage
agrees with this idea.
B. The first author believes that the Act is helpful in protecting our waters from foreign fisheries. The second
author disagrees.
C. The second author belleves that the Act is helpful for International fisheries, while the first author believes
it is helpful for U. S. fisheries.
D. The first author warns that the Act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:30
Why is “playing it cool” laced with irony for starr? the hate u give
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:40
How do the authors develop their claim about the effectiveness of restorative justice through examples involving apartheid and the rwandan genocide? cite evidence from the text in your response.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:40
Which tense allows for an event that began in the past to carry into the present moment in time
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
  which statement describes the main argument of truth’s speech
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How do these passages differ in their ideas about the Magnuson Fishery and Conservation Act?
A...
Questions
question
Physics, 14.04.2020 17:38
Questions on the website: 13722362