In 300 words, why was Nora justified in making the decision to leave her household in the story “A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen,

For Nora, her action was the right thing. She felt trapped; she felt like a play thing taken down from the shelf when her husband deemed her worth paying attention to; she had no fulfillment, no individuality. Torvald not only doesn't treat her as a wife, he can't even comprehend what she did for him he leaves her hanging, no support, no interference. This realization that there isn't and has never been any love between them seals her decision to leave.

"Our home has been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was papa's doll-child"

Her exit is a new start and the chance to grow up and be a woman.

If it is not 300 words then you can elaborate this answer

HOPE IT HELPS YOU

HAVE A GOOD DAY ☺️❤️

the excerpt from chapter 2 of "animal farm", by george orwell that is an example of foreshadowing is "these three (snowball, napoleon, and squealer) had elaborated old major's teachings into a complete system of thought to which they gave the name of animalism." animal farm is an allegory of how czarist russia developed into communist russia with all its corruption. old major's teachings represent marx's theories turned into communism, animalism, by the three pigs. this foreshadows the oppression and corruption that will follow this revolt.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.