subject
English, 04.06.2020 14:05 carsonngibbons4354

By President Richard Nixon, April 30, 1973 In 1972, five men from Nixon's administration broke into the Democratic Party's headquarters in the Watergate Hotel. Nixon denied knowledge of the break-in, but in August 1974, evidence became public that he knew about it in advance. He resigned from office four days later.

In recent months, members of my Administration and officials of the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, including some of my closest friends and most trusted aides, have been charged with involvement in what has come to be known as the Watergate affair. These include charges of illegal activity during and preceding the 1972 Presidential election and charges that responsible officials participated in efforts to cover up that illegal activity.
The inevitable result of these charges has been to raise serious questions about the integrity1 of the White House itself. Tonight I wish to address those questions.
Last June 17, while I was in Florida trying to get a few days rest after my visit to Moscow, I first learned from news reports of the Watergate break-in. I was appalled at this senseless, illegal action. And I was shocked to learn that employees of the Re-Election Committee were apparently among those guilty. I immediately ordered an investigation by appropriate Government authorities. On September 15, as you will recall, indictments2 were brought against seven defendants in the case.
As the investigations went forward, I repeatedly asked those conducting the investigation whether there was any reason to believe that members of my Administration were in any way involved. I received repeated assurances that there were not. Because of these continuing reassurances, because I believed the reports I was getting, because I had faith in the persons from whom I was getting them, I discounted3 the stories in the press that appeared to implicate members of my Administration or other officials of the campaign committee.

1. honesty
2. charges for breaking the law
3. disregarded
1
Which statement best highlights the fact that Nixon cannot be objective about Watergate?
A.
The speaker administrates a high office.
B.
The participants include his close friends.
C.
The criminal charges need to be proven.
D.
The events took place in recent months.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:30
Select the rebuttal statement that best refutes the viewpoint in section one. a) it is necessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts. b) it is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts. c) it is necessary for athletes involved in mixed martial arts to self-regulate. d) one distinctive feature of mixed martial arts is the combination of various techniques.
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which most closely analyzes the information about briony's dreams of becoming an olympic athlete?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
The question below refers to the selection “ozymandias” by percy bysshe shelley. the traveler seems to believe that — a. monuments are eternal b. the passage of time is necessary and inevitable c. we must preserve relics of past civilizations d. even the greatest works are destroyed by time
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:00
Aunit "tradition vs. change" to memorize and read aloud. in the written introduction, engage the listener; state the origin of the excerpt; and identify who wrote it and its literary significance.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
By President Richard Nixon, April 30, 1973 In 1972, five men from Nixon's administration broke into...
Questions
question
Business, 20.09.2019 20:30
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 20.09.2019 20:30
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2019 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722362