When a monster in a story does not have the ability to communicate, what is the most likely result? A. Other character will fear it because they cannot understand what it wants.
B. The monster will harm everyone that it sees.
C. Other characters will ignore it, and the story will end.
D. The monster will surrender and let other characters restrain it.

The correct answer is option A. Other character will fear it because they cannot understand what it wants.

Explanation:

If a monster cannot communicate, the mere fact of being a monster would make people afraid of it.

There are many stories where we can see "friendly monsters" but if you think about it, it is because those monsters can talk or exchange their feelings with the human in some way.

If a monster appears, and it has no way of telling you what it wants, your instinct will be to be scared and run away from it.

Given this information we can say that the correct answer is option A.

is it rising action, falling action, climax, or resolution? need answer also

wordsworth tends to see nature as 'out there'; a presence which surrounds humans, and contributes to human life, but is different from humans. if you look at a typical wordsworth poem (there was a boy, ye knew him well ye rocks) - wordsworth talks about nature as something that needs to be learned about and understood, nature is different from us.  

if you look at a byron poem (the isles of greece is a good one) - byron looks at nature mainly for what it already means to man. wordsworth will look at a landscape and see the mountains, trees, valleys, and rivers as almost spiritual presences - wordsworth wants to get to know nature.  

byron will look at the same landscape and he will want to know who lives there, what are the villages? are there any farms or mines, is there some history?  

wordsworth looks at nature for what it is; byron is forever asking what it means.  

wordsworth thinks that humans are part of nature; byron thinks that nature is part of being human