Read the counterclaim from an argumentative essay. Which reason would best refute the counterclaim?
Albel
Bob Dylan's lyrics are just as effective without musical
accompaniment.
Only die-hard fans and the uninformed would argue that
Bob Dylan's lyrics are literature.
It is impossible to separate song lyrics from the music
that accompanies them.
Song lyrics are no better than childish nonsense without
the music that accompanies them.
Dylan has written many enduring songs and received
many awards for his musical achievements.

The counterclaim given is as follows: Albel Bob Dylan's lyrics are just as effective without musical accompaniment.

The best repudiation for the counterclaim is A) which states that it is impossible to separate song lyrics from the music that accompanies them.

Explanation:

The counterclaim tries to throw weight behind the lyrics to Dylan's songs. There is no problem with this as his songs are incomplete without the lyrics.  

However, to say they (the lyrics that is,) are just as effective without musical accompaniment is to assert that anybody can pick up those lyrics and express how they want (like a poem for instance) and still achieve the same effects they had with the musical accompaniment. This, of course, is impracticable as it in a way diminishes the musical aspect of Dylan's work.  

Some of the awards that Albel Bob Dylan has received include the Presidential Medal of Freedom, ten Grammy Awards, a Golden Globe Award and an Academy Award. As far as history has it, no award has been given to him for the best poem or work of literature.

Awards are recognition of one's efforts. It's away of saying one's efforts meets a certain degree of perfection/standard. The more recognised an award is globally, the more authoritative it is considered to be.

Therefore, to agree with the statement from the counterclaim is to invariably assert that the bodies responsible for recognising superior musical prowess globally (such as the Grammy, Golden Globe and the Academy awards) might have issued the awards to him in error.  Even if one of the bodies did issue him an award in error, it is impossible on, on the balance of probabilities, for same error to be repeated across various organisations several times, over the same constant - Bob Dylan's music.

Cheers!

The best repudiation for the counterclaim is which states that it is impossible to separate song lyrics from the music that accompanies them.

The counterclaim attempts to toss weight behind the verses to Dylan's melodies. There is no issue with this as his tunes are inadequate without the verses.

Nonetheless, to say the verses that is,are similarly as compelling without melodic backup is to attest that anyone can get those verses and express how they need and still accomplish similar impacts they had with the melodic backup. This, obviously, is unrealistic as it in a way lessens the melodic part of Dylan's work.

A portion of the honors that Albel Bob Dylan has gotten incorporate the Presidential Medal of Freedom, ten Grammy Awards, a Golden Globe Award and an Academy Award.

To the extent history has it, no honor has been given to him for the best sonnet or work of writing.

Grants are acknowledgment of one's endeavors. It's away of saying one's endeavors meets a specific level of flawlessness standard. The more perceived an honor is internationally, the more legitimate it is viewed as.

Hence, to concur with the assertion from the counterclaim is to perpetually affirm that the bodies liable for perceiving prevalent melodic ability universally like the Grammy, Golden Globe and the Academy grants may have given the honors to him in blunder.

Regardless of whether one of the bodies issue him an honor in blunder, it is unimaginable on, on the equilibrium of probabilities, for same mistake to be rehashed across different associations a few times, over a similar steady.

For more information, refer the following link:

link

taking into account that a theme is the central topic a text treats and can be developed through a story, play, poem etc. the following are themes that can be further developed:  

my best friend jeffrey has many unusual interests. (the story could be about each of the unususal interests)

once a man gives his soul over to evil, he can never go back. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

the three sheepdogs lay around the yard all day. (it could be developed detailing how each of these sheepdogs lay around)

a priest's collar has an unusual effect upon people. (it could be developed detailing the different effect upon people)

innocence is a powerful force in a world full of corruption. (it could be developed detailing how is a world full of corruption)

king lear is a play shakespeare wrote later. (it is just a sentence and doesnt give any idea or topic to be discussed in details.

evil often wears the disguise of innocence. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

this is the answer , p = 1 + (1/10)x

step-by-step explanation:

we have,

at sea level pressure is 1 atmosphere (i.e at x =0, p0=1 atmosphere)

at depth 23 meters , pressure = 3.3 atmosphere

since the pressure increases at constant rate as the depth increases, so we can write a relation as:

p =p0 +   kx   , where p is the pressure  , p0 is the initial pressure, x is the depth and k is constant rate of increasing.

to find constant rate k, plug p = 3.3 , p0 = 1 and x= 23 meters

we get,

  3.3 = 1 + k * 23

k = 2.3 / 23   = 1/10

so we can write the function formula as:   p = 1 + (1/10)x