If possible, look at the evidence map at Leakin Park on the website. Combined with the narrative, what clues do you think are the most significant? What does Sarah’s

story about Mr. S’s story tell us about the case, if anything?

i would say the answer is erm c but if you dont agree im so sorry

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

the very first one i did this and passed the test with 5 wrong