ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS NO MORE THE PRPERTY OF PEOPLE LIVING ON WRITING FROM ENGLAND OR AMERICA OR AMERICA OR FROM OTHER ENGLISH SPEAKING COUNTRIES IN EUROPE BUT HAS BECOME AN INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE ELABORATE WITH APPRROPRIATE EXAMPLES ?

Yes, English language has become an a international language.

My reasons.

I. Many countries of the world has adopted it as a National language and means of communication

II. Many Organisations have adopted it as their own formal way of communicating

III. It has gained recognition in various culture, society and religions.

Explanation:

I. Many countries of the world has adopted it as a National language and means of communication: Many countries like Nigeria, Ghana and other Asian countries who have their own native languages have adopted English language as part of their national language and means of communication.

Example: In most parliaments, governments activities and discussions in many countries, continents English language is used as their means of communication.

II. Many Organisations have adopted it as their own formal way of communicating: Many Multinational and domestic Organisations in countries around the world as formally adopted English language as their own official means of communication which has helped to make the language an internationally recognised and accepted means of communication.

III. It has gained recognition in various culture, society and religions: Many religious bodies, communities continues to carry out their activities and communicate with their God,gods and themselves using English language, they have been able to translate their original books like the Bible from Greek to English etc

IV. English aides and enhances business transactions: With the continous rise in the adoption of English language as a means of communication for a business Organisations to successfully execute tasks and perform effectively it must have to communicate with English in order to be able to compete favourably and gain market entry.

faulty parallelism is a grammar construction where there is no balance in the parts of a sentence they have a similar meaning but the grammar structure is not equivalent.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation's third president.

the problem with the first version is that the sentence:

"jefferson was both the writer of the declaration of independence"

presents jefferson as both a subject and an agent for the verb "write" because if he was "the writer" then the declaration of independence was written by him, besides that fact, the sentence presents a dependent clause.

while the second sentence:

he was the nation's third president.

presents a basic subject+verb+object structure

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in both sentences:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation third president.

yah idk ether buddy good luck finding it let me know when u do find it my boi