This leaving the huskies to shift for themselves, gives rise to peculiar ethics in the North Land. A man who steals food from another is shot down without mercy. But it is different in the case of the dogs. Should a man catch one, red-handed, gorging his last piece of bacon, he may not shoot him. If he does, the dog's owner can come down upon him for his value as a draught-animal. A miners' meeting usually settles the amount. Nor is this any insignificant sum, for the prices of sled dogs range from one to five hundred dollars, and in times of need as high as a thousand. Which best explains London’s purpose for comparing the consequences of stealing for a man and for a husky? London uses the comparison to persuade readers that huskies sometimes steal food from humans. London uses the comparison to inform the reader that huskies are viewed as property worth money. London uses the comparison to entertain the reader with a story about a husky that stole bacon. London uses the comparison to inform the reader that humans and huskies are treated as equals

the answer is c. it calls attention to the urgency of the message

it is citrus : fruit

first of all, what is green literature or ecocriticism? now, don't report this, saying that i am plagiarizing, but i did get this defenition from google, because i too had to look up the defenition. ecocriticism or green literature, "is the study of literature and the environment from an interdisciplinary point of view, where literature scholars analyze texts that illustrate environmental concerns and examine the various ways literature treats the subject of nature." that being said, to summarize that, it means that the passages must both be talking similarly about an environmental issue, while also addressing the issue. the first passage talks about having to build their subways more down underground because of sewer lines. the second passage talks about, due to erosion, half of iceland's topsoil was carried into the ocean. so to sum these two up, they both have something to do with soil.

its not a because they are solving the issue, not creating more consequences. b is not correct because no where did they mention coal to being an alternative. d is incorrect because, though the ocean did cause a problem in the second passage, water and gravity have nothing to do with the first passage.

answer is c) in order meet their goals, environmentalist must people develop a personal desire to protect nature.

(sorry i would like to explain more but i have to leave right now)