In the selection, the author discusses the distinctions between several women who fought for the right to vote. How did these women differ in their approaches to achieving suffrage? In what way were these women connected? Write an essay of two to three paragraphs explaining your answer.
In your answer, be sure to
• explain how various women differed in their approaches to achieving suffrage
• explain how the women were connected
• use details from the selection to support your answer

she was trying to use   reliable narrator.

what was the conclusion

explanation:

since conclusion is the over all summarize.

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

amazing

explanation:

i really like the quality of it and how it's been played keep it up