What can you infer about Mrs. Hale’s perception of Mr. Hale.?

Mrs. Hale perceived Mr Hale to be bad story-teller from which one can infer that Mr Hale's testimony should not be considered truthful as there is possibility of mixing of Mr Hale's own thoughts in it.

Explanation:

'A Jury of Her Peers' is a short story adapted from one-act play entitled 'Trifles', both written by Susan Glaspell.

The story is told from Mrs Hale's point of view about the situation of Mrs Wright and in what circumstance she might have murdered her husband, Mr Wright.

Mrs Hale, when was asked to accompany men to Wright's house, got to know that Mr Hale was the witness of Mr Wright's murder, as he was the first person who received the news of Mr Wright's murder from Mrs Wright.

This worried Mrs Hale as she knew that Mr Hale is bad at story-telling and he adds his own thoughts while narrating an event. She considered this to be a problem because if Mr Hale added his own comments to the narrating of story, it would be considered true and Mrs Wright will be in a serious problem.

This perception of Mrs Hale towards Mr Hale's shows that Mrs Hale is aware of cruelty of men dominance in society. And this also suggests that Mrs Hale's does not consider her husband's account to be truthful.  

its everything except for telling nonfiction and using first person

oh i didn't know thx for tell me hallelujah