In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of synthesizing claims into a single conclusion?
A. Even though we each found a different piece of evidence to
support our conclusion, we can agree that Shakespeare was an
anti-imperialist.
B. I don't quite understand what standards you're using when you say
that Homer was the greatest epic writer.
C. The theater scene from Dickens's Great Expectations proves to me
that the author both enjoyed the theater and had a lighthearted
attitude about it.
D. When you argue that Shgikespeare was anti-imperialist, you don't
really use any kind of evidence that would hold up under close
scrutiny

A. Even though we each found a different piece of evidence to

support our conclusion, we can agree that Shakespeare was an

anti-imperialist.

Explanation:

This would aknowledge the fact that everyone found different solutions, yet they all fit into a single conclusion.

explanation

old disney was more kid oriented as appose to new disney it's more teen oriented.i guess what i'm trying to say is new disney is way more mature and out there then old disney. for instance all you see in new disney is bf/gf drama and old disney it was nothing like that. kids are growing up and as coorpations like disney, nickolden etc they tend to follow what kids follow so they can have more views . therefore   they have inferred   that now days kids want to have relationships and stuff so that's what disney gives them.

b. failure at least that one seems the most negative out of all of the answers provided pls correct me if i'm wrong. : ))