Part A What are the central ideas in the Newsela article "Health Benefits of Reading, Writing, Are Not Just for Patients"? Reading and writing can improve health and everyone should read every day. Reading and writing are healthy, and positivity is important for health. Reading might be beneficial for health, and more research is needed to prove it. Reading and writing can help cure disease, and science is studying the benefits. Question 2 Part B Which statements from the text best support the answer in Part A? Select the two correct answers. “A movement called narrative medicine has been growing. It comes from the idea that both writing and reading literature can help doctors and patients to communicate better." “Raymond Mar is a professor at York University in Toronto. He studies the effect reading fiction and nonfiction has on our ability to understand what others are feeling." "If you have an experience and you sit down and write about it, you can pour that emotion out,' Harper says. 'Getting rid of these thoughts and emotions helps to find meaning in the death or the survival of a patient — and then allows you to move on with your life, he says.'" "'We learn through the experiences of the characters we read about,' Coke says. Because we empathize, or feel what others are feeling, we expand our understanding of other people in other situations. We are also less bothered by our own misfortunes." PLZ ANSWER THIS

Read juliet's soliloquy from act iv, scene iii. based on her dialogue, explain the conflict that juliet faces. is the conflict primarily external or internal? explain why.

In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.

How do i correct this sentence correctly?