Quote We never live we always live in expectations of living - Voltaire

Occasion: Why was this piece created? What influenced the creation of the piece in question?

Purpose: What is the argument being made?

Speaker: what do you know about the speaker? What can you infer about their ideas? How does this affect the argument?

Tone: How does the author/speaker/creator feel about the piece in question?

such as answering phones, scheduling appointments, sending faxes, and filing documents.

explanation:

all of the following except for c.foreign government

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.