The presence of an unreliable narrator means

i. the story is all false and not worth reading.

ii. you can't trust the accuracy of the information.

iii. the narrator may be lying or unable to give accurate information

i only

i and ii

ii only

ii and iii

The correct answer is D. II and III (II. You can't trust the accuracy of the information and III. The narrator may be lying or unable to give accurate information)

Explanation:

An unreliable narrator is a type of narrator that lacks credibility or who is not completely credible, this is usually related to a narrator being insane, being naive, lying, exaggerating or not being sure about certain events or what she or he is saying, which makes the reader unable to trust completely in what the narrator says, thinks or describes. Unreliable narrators are usually first-person narrators and are used by the author to reveal information that is hidden during the story or to make it more complex. In this way, as the narrator is not credible there is no accuracy of the information he gives ( statement II), as he might be lying or by any other reason providing information that differs from the reality presented in the story (statement III).

a compare and contrast essay is a piece of formal writing in which the author focus on the similarities between two ideas, objects, places, etc., and the differences between them. there are some aspects that the author should take into account when he/she is crafting the essay. first, the author has a clear idea of the effect that he/she wants to produce on the audience (a purpose). his/her main idea should be presented in the thesis statement in a simple but effective way which gives the audience a clear idea of the content and the direction of the essay. in addition, it is also important to focus to the similarities and differences that not only are interesting and relevant to the reader but also provide a new, impressive point of view or deeper understanding of a topic.