Consider the following two cases: While lying by a lake, Lance sees a child drowning in the water. Normally, Lance would be too preoccupied with getting a tan to care about rescuing the child. In this case, however, he notices that an attractive woman, apparently unable to swim herself, is shouting for help. Hoping to impress the woman, Lance jumps in the water and saves the child.
While lying by a lake, Bob sees a child drowning in the water. Although he is a poor swimmer, Bob is terrified by the prospect of the child drowning. With the welfare of the child being his top concern, Bob jumps into the water and saves the child.
Would Mill agree that one of these two actions is more morally right than the other? Explain your answer.

1. this would be first person. it would be like "i walked home from school today" they are the narrator of the story and is a character as well.

2. first person because they used the word "i" in the quote.

3. i'm really not sure about this one i'm really sorry i never read it so i wouldn't know how to answer it. 

4. it would be character vs. society because everyone he meets there is always a conflict of some sort because he's stuck in his daydream.

5. it would be sadness at the loss of youth because the title itself tells us it's about age so it couldn't be about regret. and the tone just sounds sad, not angry. 

i hope this !

the answer should be the first one. "many people find his lyrics very moving."

it by far makes the most grammatical sense and is very objective, removing any first person from the original sentence and keeping with the sentence fluency.

but it is sometime nessary to hit key points or subjects   but is sometimes to much reveiw if there was a way to slim down the redone work it would improve for every body.