subject
English, 02.10.2020 14:01 rleiphart1

Read the negative position from "Animal Rights Debate.” It is clear that humans are superior to animals, and therefore animals should not have the same rights as human beings. The Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that only humans have the ability to reason. Animals only have instincts to guide them. Therefore, they are not sentient, or thinking, beings like humans are. In addition, humans show their superiority to animals through control. Humans have superior abilities that allow them to raise animals for a variety of uses. Human beings are in control of animal life, making animal rights unnecessary.

Which statement best uses the ideas of the negative position to provide an affirmative rebuttal?

Animals can show humanlike traits, such as cooperation and the use of tools.
The purpose of animals is to be either consumed or used, regardless of whether they can reason with others.
Even though humans can communicate their reasoning better than animals, animals like chimpanzees have shown that they reflect on their own thoughts.
In the United States, several laws have been created to ensure that animals should be protected from animal cruelty, regardless of their ability to reason.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 20:20
Read the following excerpt from life on the mississippi by mark twain. no girl could withstand his charms. he "cut out" every boy in the village. when his boat blew up at last, it diffused a tranquil contentment among us such as we had not known for months. but when he came home the next week, alive, renowned, and appeared in church all battered up and bandaged, a shining hero, stared at and wondered over by everybody, it seemed to us that the partiality of providence for an undeserving reptile had reached a point where it was open to criticism. how does twain's use of understatement serve his purpose? be sure to use specific details from the text to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs. match each excerpt to the type of characterization it uses.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:40
Julius caesar. [brutus.] with this, she fell distraught, and, her attendants absent, swallowed fire. cassius. and died so? brutus. even so. cassius. o ye immortal gods! [enter lucius, with wine and taper] brutus. speak no more of her. give me a bowl of wine. in this i bury all unkindness, cassius. cassius. my heart is thirsty for that noble pledge. fill, lucius, till the wine o'erswell the cup; i cannot drink too much of brutus' love. [exit lucius. enter titinius, with messala] brutus. come in, titinius; welcome, good messala. now sit we close about this taper here, and call in question our necessities. cassius. portia, art thou gone? brutus. no more, i pray you. what moral dilemma does brutus confront in this excerpt? brutus lets go of his anger toward cassius and forgives him. brutus decides that he will not mourn portia and will stay loyal to cassius. brutus decides that he is too angry at cassius to remain friends with him. brutus questions whether cassius's life should be ended.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
What is sue’s reaction to her phone call
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the negative position from "Animal Rights Debate.” It is clear that humans are superior to ani...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 22.07.2019 08:30
question
Social Studies, 22.07.2019 08:30
Questions on the website: 13722361