I will mark brainliest if is right Supporting Question: How should we interpret the status of women at the time of the Constitution’s creation? Directions: Answer the Supporting Question of the inquiry in an evidence-based paragraph based around an argumentative claim.

You will be assessed and receive feedback on the following Cognitive Skills:

Argumentative Claim

Selection of Evidence

Write your answer here:

bhai mark me brainlist answer please follow me

Explanation:

“But what if women indeed were mentioned? Would we have to change our interpretation of the place of women in the Constitution?”

Several years ago, a friend who was editing a special issue of a history journal asked me to contribute an article about women and the Constitution. Having just completed some research on women and The Federalist, I knew the technique that I would use: Assuming that women were nowhere discussed in the debates in the Constitutional Convention, I would look at the use of gendered language for clues about what the Founders thought about women and their place in the government they were creating. Like most other historians, I believed that the available political ideologies–republicanism and liberalism–excluded women. Republicanism extolled self-sacrifice for the common good, while liberalism vaunted the individual. But neither ideology, received wisdom held, thought that a woman could be a citizen, with a politically significant self, either to sacrifice or to be served by government.

the answer is b-$11,337.

hdhdjdudjsbssvvzv. hdhdg