subject
English, 07.10.2020 21:01 winterblanco

1. Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? A. Employers are more likely to hire people with double- majors because they expect them to know more across multiple disciplines.
B. It's been proven that people who are naturally innovative are more likely to pursue double-majors and succeed in their career.
C. Double-majors are getting the better of other graduates in the job market, as it's becoming increasingly common to have a double-major.
D. People who double-major are more likely to possess the innovative traits that employers look for when hiring.
2
Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
А. *This finding held even after we controlled for a number of variables, including a family history of entrepreneurship, courses taken in college, race, gender and GPA." (Paragraph 5)
B. "These innovative qualities matter in the job market. That's because employers want more from college graduates than good grades." (Paragraph 8)
C. "It could be a signal of proactive and creative choice for students who don't fit the mold in terms of how higher education is currently delivered."
(Paragraph 11)
D. "What we do suggest, however, is that colleges and universities help students find ways to integrate material across disciplines, interact with each other across
majors, and work on teams to solve real-world problems." (Paragraph 14)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 05:50
Why does koskoosh give up his fight with the wolves
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
(01.03 mc) what does the conversation between marcus and his father reveal about their characters? a marcus doesn't agree with the regulations put in place, but his father does. b marcus's father doesn't agree with the regulations put in place, but marcus does. c marcus's father thinks the regulations provide security, and so does marcus. d marcus wants stricter regulations to be put in place, and his father agrees.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
Charles darwin time connective and dates
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
1. Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? A. Employers are more likely to hire pe...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 01:00
question
Chemistry, 26.01.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722361