Read the excerpt below from Little Women and answer the question. "Hadn't you rather have her marry a rich man?" asked Jo, as her mother's voice faltered a little over the
last words.
"Money is a good and useful thing, Jo, and I hope my girls will never feel the need of it too bitterly, nor be
tempted by too much. I should like to know that John was firmly established in some good business, which
gave him an income large enough to keep free from debt and make Meg comfortable. I'm not ambitious for a
splendid fortune, a fashionable position, or a great name for my girls. If rank and money come with love and
virtue, also, I should accept them gratefully, and enjoy your good fortune, but I know, by experience, how
much genuine happiness can be had in a plain little house, where the daily bread is earned, and some
privations give sweetness to the few pleasures. I am content to see Meg begin humbly, for if I am not
mistaken, she will be rich in the possession of a good man's heart, and that is better than a fortune."
One of the lessons that Alcott attempts to teach throughout Little Women is that of the value of hard
work to earn one's place in the world. Thinking of examples from the real world, from the story, and
specifically using Mrs. March's words how would you differentiate between happiness in material goods
and happiness in being genuine? For your answer, write at least 100 words.

Mrs. March said,"Money is a good and useful thing, Jo, and I hope my girls will never feel the need of it too bitterly, nor be tempted by too much" The happiness between material goods and happiness in being genuine are quite different. Material goods are things that could be destroyed, stolen, or temporary things that can be used up and worn out. Genuine happiness is being happy with the people you love and the people you respect without having to have material goods. With genuine happiness all you need are people you love and people that you want to be around because you are truly happy when you're with them.

Hope this helped :)

Please give me brainliest!

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

learning how to embrace the effects of colonialism is one of the central ideas of the play.