Which strategy is best for the negative position to use to create a strong rebuttal against the affirmative position? explaining that the tax will not make a significant difference in the amount of plastic waste
presenting the idea that the improved environment is worth the extra taxes and asking a follow-up question
explaining that the source used by the affirmative position is unreliable and suggesting an alternative source
presenting the plastic-tax argument in a different way by stating that it would be an unnecessary burden for people