Compare the actual text to the clip shown. How are they different besides the language shown? Here is where your analysis skills come in. Are these two giving us the same ideas that Shakespeare presented for
his period? How? Which is the stronger argument for YOU? Why? Look at Shakespeare's language in the
text, think about the fact that he was writing for the stage not a movie? How does the format of these two
change how it could be presented?

What is a good way to condense collected research? a. underline the pieces of evidence you want to use. b. annotate in your books using page markers. c. take notes on loose-leaf paper or a computer. d. organize each source by category, such as books or websites.

What is the most important lesson wiley learns in "wiley, his mother, and the hairy man"?

Read the excerpt from muir's essay "calypso borealis" and answer the question. [5] how long i sat beside calypso i don't know. hunger and weariness vanished, and only after the sun was low in the west i splashed on through the swamp, strong and exhilarated as if never more to feel any mortal care. at length i saw maple woods on a hill and found a log house. i was gladly received. "where ha ye come fra? the swamp, that awfu' swamp. what were ye doin' there? " etc. "mony a puir body has been lost in that muckle, cauld, dreary bog and never been found." when i told her i had entered it in search of plants and had been in it all day, she wondered how plants could draw me to these awful places, and said, "it's god's mercy ye ever got out." examine the details muir includes in this paragraph. which statement accurately explains how muir's response to nature compares to the log house owner's response? he is enthusiastic and in awe while she is doubtful and fearful. muir cautiously admires whereas the lady shows religious dedication. the lady is more interested in the bog while muir is fascinated by plants. they both admire nature—its intense dangers and its true treasures.