How might the effect of this piece be different if the author had chosen to write a nonfiction argumentative text instead of a novel? Why do you think Ellison chose to communicate his message through fiction rather than nonfiction?(The Invisible Man)

the author is intending to draw attention to the plight of refugees, editorial and biography support this. both workpieces make the reader empathize with enrique as well as with the other young migrants from central america. the writer, however, is using a different approach to each text.

the editorial includes strong words to persuade readers. he is trying hard to convince readers in the us to change its refugee approach.

the biography relies on narrative techniques and figurative language which the writer uses wisely in the setting, characterization, and personification to educate readers on the topic.

whats the passage

explanation:

you have no answers to choose

the answer is allusion. give me brainliest