What is the counterargument in the article? A. Language should not change over time, but remain consistent for ease of communication information to others B. Using alternative forms of written communication, like emoticons, is ruining modern language C. Emoticons allow for faster communication and the ability to convey complex feelings in written communications D. Verbal communication modes are more effective for sharing important or complex information over written communication

A. Language should not change over time, but remain consistent for ease of communication information to others

Explanation:

This is the counterargument in the article. This is because, language which has been as old as man should not change overtime. For example, use of emoticons most times confuse an individual who is communicating with another person due to lack of understanding of those emoticons.

ws nmkjuhj bm ,mbavzcbgsndhmf

explanation:

hnubgyftr86h7nhijpmbhbuvfh b

hey kid learn to actually put time and effort into your school work and maybe you would get higher grades and not have to come on this website and beg for answer's