Which reason would best refute the counterclaim? Bob Dylan’s lyrics are just as effective without musical accompaniment

Dylan has written many enduring and received many awards for his musical achievements

Explanation:

Only die hard fans and the uninformed would argue that Bob Dylan lyrics are literature

This is wrong because anybody can argue his lyrics are literature, not just his fans.

It is impossible to separate song lyrics from the music that accompanies them

That is not true at all. I sing for my school and we practice with only a metronome to make sure we're on beat.

Sing lyrics are no better than childish nonsense without the music that accompanies them

That's not true at all, because as long as you sing the same music, with or without the background music, it's still the same words. Also, that's an opinion which cannot be proven making it an invalid answer.

Dylan has written many enduring and received many awards for his musical achievements

This is a fact that can be proven, and this is true! This proves his lyrics are as effective without musical accompaniment.

I hope this helped! Please mark me as Brainliest!!!

i think the literacy device is "it's frozen head"

this answer to this question is c. allegory

why?

stories with allegories have a hidden symbolic meaning with a theme. the hidden meaning can be political, or other real life problems.