It was about this time that the pigs suddenly moved into the farmhouse and took up their residence there. Again the animals seemed to remember that a resolution against this had been passed in the early days, and again Squealer was able to convince them that this was not the case. It was absolutely necessary, he said, that the pigs, who were the brains of the farm, should have a quiet place to work in. It was also more suited to the dignity of the Leader (for of late he had taken to speaking of Napoleon under the title of “Leader”) to live in a house than in a mere sty. Nevertheless, some of the animals were disturbed when they heard that the pigs not only took their meals in the kitchen and used the drawing-room as a recreation room, but also slept in the beds. Boxer passed it off as usual with “Napoleon is always right!”, but Clover, who thought she remembered a definite ruling against beds, went to the end of the barn and tried to puzzle out the Seven Commandments which were inscribed there. –Animal Farm, George Orwell Which statement best describes how Boxer’s response supports the author’s purpose? Boxer’s anger shows how the working class could be the leaders of a revolution. Boxer’s defiance shows how the working class could not be swayed by propaganda. Boxer’s acceptance shows how the working class could be manipulated by those in power. Boxer’s agreement with Squealer shows how the working class was equal to the upper class.

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

explanation: excuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snotexcuse me by snot