Why might genuine, as opposed to leading, questions about someone else's position on a topic lead to better disagreements?

Genuine and open conversations can be had

Explanation:

Arguments and Disagreements are meant to be productive. They are meant to educate both parties on the background of the stance taken by the other party so that both parties understand each other better.

When Leading questions (questions aimed at eliciting a certain response) are asked, the other party answers in a way that may not necessarily reflect their views on the matter.

Genuine questions on the other hand, will give the other party a chance to properly defend their stance and air their views such that the party asking understands better.

1) technical language (writen technical volcabulary)

2) ordinary langauge

3) literary language (because it's text with a rich, descriptive vocabulary)

4) scientific texts (includes texts such as medical reports, legal texts, academic journals, etc)

5) informational texts (texts that are used to convey information to readers, such as technical guides, costumer guides, textbooks)

6) poetic texts. because they are essays, short stories, poems, etc.

i c

yas the answer is c