1. 1. all roses are red.
2. i have a red flower.
3. i have a rose.

which of the following best describes this series of statements?
a. inductive reasoning with valid inference in point 1

b. deductive reasoning with a valid conclusion in point 3

c inductive reasoning with an invalid inference in point 1

d. deductive reasoning with an invalid conclusion in point 3

The correct answer is D. Deductive reasoning with an invalid conclusion in Point 3

Explanation:

Deductive reasoning is the process of concluding something by reasoning about a specific statement or statements, usually called premises. Deductive reasoning differs from inductive reasoning as a general premise is taken to a particular or specific case, instead of generalizing as in inductive reasoning. Additionally, whether the conclusion of a premise is true or not depends on whether all the premises are true. Considering this it can be said, this example shows a deductive reasoning as it begins in a general premise and apply that premise to a particular case, however, the conclusion is invalid as not all the premises are true as "all roses are red" is a wrong premise as roses are of different colors and thus, the conclusion "I have a rose" is also invalid.  

idk that a good answer

explanation:

i will try let me see what they are first