What four things should you evaluate in an argument? A. How relevant and sufficient the evidence, how logical the reasoning is, and whether there is a counterargument
B. How clear and realistic the evidence is, how logical the reasoning is, and whether there is a counterargument
C. How detailed and specific the reasoning is, how factual the evidence is, and what the author's claim is
D. How relevant and specific the reasoning is, how important the counterargument is, and what the author's purpose is

b. cronkite, a trusted television personality, declared that the war was unwinnable and told the american people that the government had better find a way out

even though it went against everything the news anchors typically stood for, cronkite voiced an opinion and took a stance, telling the us that there was no way they were going to win, the war was going to end in a stalemate. 

hot and dry

i need 20 things so this was just randomly added. hot and dry is the answer

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)

the answer is 2 : ) hope it