Which statement best compares how the two authors address this topic? Memmott writes well after the events occurred, while Alvarez writes while the events are occurring.
Memmott tells about one event that occurred, while Alvarez tells about the dictatorship as a whole.
Memmott gives an anecdote to tell about the dictatorship’s cruelty, while Alvarez tells about her family.
Memmott presents facts about the dictatorship objectively, while Alvarez gives details about how it affected people.

Memmott presents facts about the dictatorship objectively, while Alvarez gives details about how it affected people.

most likely you should find things like facts and important information to you understand. i hope this .

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)