Read the passage and then answer the question that follows. When Mike adjusted his bicycle, I thought I was watching a chess game. He would stare at a part for a while before he acted. Then we would wait for his opponent's response. For example, he stared for ten minutes before tightening the rear sprockets. Then he rode the bike for a minute, analyzing the change in the bike's performance. At first, I thought he was too careful. Now, I realize he didn't want the bicycle to become his Waterloo.

Which is a true statement about the passage?

A. It contains an analogy that compares Mike to someone watching a chess game.
B. It contains an allusion that compares Mike to someone watching a chess game.
C. It contains an analogy that compares Mike's adjusting his bicycle to a chess game.
D. It contains an allusion that compares Mike's adjusting his bicycle to a chess game.

I think its C

Explanation:

The person said that watching Mike adjust his bike is like watching a chess game so they are comparing Mike adjusting his bike to a chess game (im probably wrong)

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

its specific purpose is to sell a product to people .

can i get brainliest!