Dear Editor, Fascinating grammar/spelling the other night on the second evening of the NBC movie 10.5. The movie was bad enough ... 30 minutes of action crammed into four hours of viewing. What really caught my attention was the writing. Yes, the plot was wretched, the emoting was pathetic. Yet there was something even more glaring in this age of butchering the English language. I pine for the days of correct English when "you know" and "like" didn't crop up as every other word! Stinson Mix, Farmersville, TX What should Mr. Mix add to his letter to make it more convincing? A. Include comments on the acting. B. Include a review of the direction. C. Include the editor's name. D. Include an example of how the movie didn't use correct English.

D. Include an example of how the movie didn't use correct English.

Explanation:

According to the letter from Mr Mix to the editor of the NBC movie 10.5, he stated that the movie was terrible, the action scenes were crammed to make a longer movie, the plot was bad, and worse of all, the use of English was pathetic.

The only thing that Mr Mix should add to his letter to make it more convincing is to include an example of how the movie didn't use correct English.

answer: idk

explanation:

answer

answer: a: they can affect the author’s perspective and in turn the theme and purpose for the writing.

the author's background and time period greatly affect the text that the author produces. this is because we are all a reflection of our time period and background. depending on where and when we were born, we will find some questions more important than others. for example, if we are a wealthy person born in medieval times, we will most likely be interested in courtly love and stories of knights and honour. however, if we are born in the 20th century in africa, we might instead focus on colonialism and its effects on the newly liberated countries. the theme and the purpose of writing are both affected by these conditions.

explanation: