Which of the following illustrates a reason that supports Marie Colvin's claim that the job of being a war correspondent is worth the risk? * War correspondents must report on humanitarian disasters and civilian atrocities to bring awareness to others.

Journalists covering combat shoulder great responsibilities and face difficult choices
It has never been more dangerous to be a war correspondent because the journalist in the combat zone has become a prime target.

Today we must also remember how important it is that news organizations continue to invest in sending us out at great cost, both financial and emotional, to cover stories.

War correspondents must report on humanitarian disasters and civilian atrocities to bring awareness to others.

Explanation:

Marie Colvin was an American journalist who worked as a foreign affairs correspondent for The Sunday Times from 1985 until her death in 2012, when she lost her life while covering the siege of Homs in Syria.

As Colvin said in her speech from 2010, the job of a war correspondent is a dangerous one. Journalists have become prime targets in the war zone, and many of them end up injured or killed. Colvin first lost an eye, and then her life, as well. However, she claimed that it was all worth the risk. War correspondents have an important mission - to report on humanitarian disasters and civilian atrocities to bring awareness to others. Without them, we wouldn't know about many things that have taken and continue to take place around the world.

these have to be in your own words

i have 15 more questions to answer and i’m a english person