Background Information: This passage comes from the How did the Siege of Pensacola end? diary of General Bernardo de Gálvez. It is written in the
third person; Gálvez refers to himself as "the General."
Galvez surrendered.
When he uses "both Generals," he is referring to himself
and General Campbell
The British flag was raised.
The British surrendered.
The firing resumed until three o'clock in the afternoon
when Fort George [the British fort at Pensacola) hoisted Galvez granted all Campbell's proposals
the white flag [General] Campbell [the commander of
the British) proposed several articles (of surrender),
some being granted and others refused. At one o'clock at
night both Generals came to an agreement. ... On the
1oth at three o'clock in the afternoon ... the General
came out with his troops and after having surrendered
the flag ... they laid down their arms with the usual
ceremonies.

It’s c the British surrendered

#1  sara was always tasked with selecting birthday presents for her friends and family because everyone admired her  impeccable taste. 

impeccable (adj): perfect, flawless

#2  they moved to the united states many years ago, but their  insular  attitudes made it difficult for them to socialize. 

insular (adj): isolated; separate

#3  the professor explained the  semantic  relationship between the two nouns used in the sentence. 

semantic (adj): related to words or the meanings of words 

happy to : )

annie´s footprints are on the kitchen floor. the triplet who is telling the truth is danny.

yes it did. that's been proven time and again. i used to be an elementary school teacher myself, and i worked with thousands of kids with cerebral palsy across the nation and in canada. what i observed was that children with dyslexia were struggling to read and learn. it was a serious issue that impacted teachers all over the country, but it was so often ignored and denied.

and children with disabilities – children who have learning disabilities – they got to spend a lot of time reading in a classroom.

i could not believe there was never any kind of conversation in my school about how to provide more opportunities for students with disabilities. the education system was still looking for ways to keep the pressure on children's teachers to improve their grades, that they have to be teachers who were in the grade for eight years, and they weren't even being evaluated.

so why weren't parents or guardians concerned about whether their kids were being by this system, if they could not see their kids in a classroom that they could improve? why couldn't you say, "i think you need to improve your reading skills," right? and they certainly believed it when i pointed it out to them. it doesn't matter if you said, "you need to go to an optometry class, or to a teacher's camp