This question is about the boy in the striped pajamas please help Answer the following questions in complete sentences.
1. How does the trailer compare to the book? Is it an accurate representation of the story you read? Why or why not?
2. What changes would you make to the book trailer? If you would not make any changes, please explain why.

1. The book trailer does not accurately represent the story The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. It fails to give us any sort of representation of what exactly this book was set to describe, but simply says phrases like "see the world through a child's eyes." This could be describing any number of topics, like how a child sees the importance of recess, rather than specifically how a child reacts to the differences he or she has with another child.

2. If I could change the trailer, I would include more details implying that a child may not see any racial or religious differences between themselves and another child. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas talks all about how Bruno doesn't notice any significant differences between himself and the boy on the other side of the fence, and this should be more accurately represented in the book trailer

Let me know if this answer is a bit confusing and I can better explain it!!

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

this is what i put and it was correct

it's a way for authors to communicate with reader in this time period. books from the past can teach us about life.