read the sentence.

i want to be a doctor, i have to do well in science class.

which revision most effectively corrects the comma splice?

a. i want to be a doctor doing well in science class.
b. wanting to be a doctor doing well in science class.
c. i want to be a doctor i have to do well in science class.
d. if i want to be a doctor, i have to do well in science class.

D. If I want to be a doctor, I have to do well in science class.

Explanation:

In the sentence given in the question, the main purpose or point of the sentence is -

in order to become a doctor, one needs to do well in the science class.

Now, according to the cause and effect relationship of the sentence, the cause is the "doing well in science class" part while the effect will be "becoming a doctor". For the latter to happen, the former has to be done first.

Thus, to rewrite the whole sentence in a correct way, it has to be written as

"If I want to be a doctor, I have to do well in science class", which correctly implies the cause and effect sequence of the proposed purpose of the sentence.

a tiger who seemed to be strangely talking to a mouse near a huge tree. that is when i noticed that the tiger was weirdly hitting the bottom of the tree with his large paws, and to my amazement the tree seemed to open up to some underground

that is my idea for you to develop your story

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

in   ¨and yet the books¨   by czelaw miloz the tone is positive since it tells us that when we touch a book, it starts to live and the perspective is in the third person and turns once into the first person. in "the rhinoceros" by eugene ionesco the tone is illogical and absurd   and the perspective is in the third person since it is a play.