Read the scenario about a formal discussion. When he presents his point of view in a group discussion, Will is knowledgeable, acknowledges other viewpoints, and answers questions fully. However, he uses many slang terms and idioms when he speaks. Which skill should Will improve to become more effective at participating in a formal discussion? being prepared to speak on the topic supporting a point of view with facts using language appropriate for the topic explaining his point of view to others

Will should improve on his language communication & presentation skills.

Explanation:

Group Discussion is a discussion among a group of people, related to a certain topic. Good tips for participation in a Group discussion are : Be confident, relevant towards topic, courteous towards others, use good & clear language to communicate.

Will is knowledgeable, acknowledges other viewpoints, and answers questions fully. So, he is relevant, courteous & confident. However, he uses many slang terms and idioms when he speak. As slangs, idioms, technical jargons are sometimes cumbersome to understand & interpret. So, he should improve his communication & presentation skills - to make points more clear, concrete & understandable.

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

im just here for the points

explanation: