1. The author would like to combine these two sentences: His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time. Stefan
was afforded every possible luxury and privilege.

2. Which of the following gives the best combination of the two
sentences?

A.)His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in
Vienna at the time; Stefan was afforded every possible
luxury and privilege.

B.) Zweig was afforded every possible luxury and privilege
because his parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite
in Vienna at the time.

C.) Born to parents who were part of Bienna's Jewish
cultural elite, Stefan was afforded every possible luxury
and privilege.

D.) His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in
Vienna at the time, and so Stefan benefited from their
eliteness with luxury.

Which of the following words best describes gregors life as expressed in this passage a.) excitingb.)surprisingc.)satisfying d.)demanding

What is the significance of the novel's title? what is the "sweet hereafter"? a). a place you go after a tragedy takes your life b). a beautiful place the dead go, like heaven c). into the sunset, an ending that is not defined d). a dark sad place the dead go before rebirth

Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.